As your City Councilor I will work to install proper, safe, and separated bike lanes while individual communities undergo neighbourhood rehab.
I’ve asked people while campaigning about what they think about bike lanes? Many have admitted that they do not like them.
Thanks to the always excellent work of pollster Janet Brown of Opinion Research, who provided CBC Edmonton with survey results for their Edmonton: Our Future series, of 16 municipal priorities, expanded bike lanes came in dead last, favoured by only 26 percent of respondents, while 42 percent felt they were not important.
And instinct tells me there’s even more of a geographical divide, where bike lanes are more popular in the core of the city in Strathcona, Oliver and downtown, and even less so in Ipiihkoohkanipiaohtsi.
What to do about it?
In 30 years covering city hall as a radio journalist I’ve seen what’s worked, and what hasn’t, and the original concept of bike lanes tops that list.
I spoke about it with Ahmed Selim on his myradio580 program.
They were first brought in as painted lines that no one liked. Motorists saw two lanes of traffic squeezed into one, clogging up intersections in far flung parts of the city where it didn’t make any sense.
Many cyclists did not feel comfortable or safe without a clear barrier protecting them from traffic so they wound up avoiding them.
And don’t forget the seasonal problem of snow covered and icy roads, sitting alongside bike lanes that were ploughed and cleared right down to the bare pavement.
In the end, at a cost of millions of taxpayers’ dollars, city employees blasted the paint off the pavement.
We all came out losers in the end because some in the city’s roads department pushed this through without proper council oversight.
You’ve already paid for them
My proposal is to install proper safe separated bike lanes while individual communities undergo neighbourhood rehab. That’s the work where roads are resurfaced, cracked and falling apart sidewalks and curbs are rebuilt, and sewers are maintained.
Over a ten year stretch you had been paying a line item on your property taxes dedicated to building up the fund for specific neighbourhood reconstruction. So that also provides the opportunity to design and build safe separated bike lanes that will actually get used, while still allowing traffic to move without interruption. Sidewalks can be redesigned too, to improve pedestrian safety.
What are the other priorities?
Based on Brown’s survey results, maintaining existing roads topped the list with 82 percent saying that’s highly important. I couldn’t agree more. And based on what I wrote earlier in the campaign the auditor has some suggestions on how to improve snow removal that I think should be acted on.
Rounding out the top five, and I agree with these as priorities, attracting and retaining young people — especially entrepreneurs, address homelessness and systemic discrimination, and keep residential property taxes low. Absolutely.
What I think that’s lower in the survey and deserves to rank higher, and I’ll strive to do that, is to keep commercial and business property taxes low as well.
Edmonton’s business community, as our primary job creator, needs all the help it can get.
There are business owners who have a clear vision on how they want to create jobs. Yet they run into roadblocks set up by the City of Edmonton’s administration. By trying to control them, it does more harm than good.
That’s why I am vowing to improve the food truck permit process, to make things more streamlined.
I heard from one food truck operator recently that I reported on in 2018. Seems to me, instead of the city improving the situation, it has gone backwards.
How I think things should be handled
Who do you think knows better on how to manage a particular industry? It’s the individuals themselves who rely on things operating smoothly.
I’ve heard similar issues with Edmonton’s festivals. They suggest they can band together as an entity and deliver a product at less cost to the taxpayer than what’s in place now.
I see my job as your city councillor to have it so I’d gain support among my colleagues to change the rules. That way food truck owners would attest to a promise of performance. Then if they stray from what they intend on doing, they would have to deal with city staff to correct things. But the city would not intervene before then.
City council should set the standard for how things operate, then the administration and the players involved should work together to make it happen. If an outlier truck doesn’t cooperate, then bylaw at that point should step in.
Here is what is lacking
There are about 175 food vendors who require permits, and one administrator to process the requests. There is no longer an automated online system these days, brought in because of Covid-19 when the parks were temporarily closed.
City staff play “king maker” picking winners and losers for locations. The food and beverage industry experts could likely sort that out themselves, even allowing for more trucks in each park location, properly spaced apart, and allowing the market to thrive on its own.
A whole new set of Parkland Vending Guidelines were imposed on food truck operators three months ago in February. A truck can no longer have location rights to three parks, yet they can still access three locations on Edmonton’s roads.
Another setback for operators that they’re still getting used to is they have to renew on a month-by-month basis instead of carrying over permits over several months.
If it were up to me, there would be a more streamlined, automatic system that covers off an extended period of time. That way operators could spend more of their day working to find ways to innovate their business, and grow the economy, instead of answering to the bureaucracy.
Tangent’s Treats is one of those innovative companies that fits a unique customer base. They’re well known for baked goods that are specific to two sets of clients -- man’s best friend, and the dogs’ owners. In my dealings with them, I can see why they’ve been very successful in their niche market.
Yet they can only make things work at parks that allow dogs in off-leash areas. Not every city park fits that bill -- like Hawrelak, or Emily Murphy. Having city staff handle scheduling might miss that crucial point.
The industry itself has the ability to map out a schedule and locations, instead of having the city do it for them. As an industry they can make sure “like” trucks providing the same product aren’t duplicating service at one location, while others are missing.
Things changed because of Covid. Now is an opportunity to emerge with a better plan
Here’s where it gets tricky. The system already prevents food trucks from parking at the entrance to some dog parks because they are too close to residential areas.
Wouldn’t it be great if dog park users could grab a beverage or a snack? The way it is now the rules prevent the chance to make a sale or two on account of regulations on the books dictating what happens near residential neighbourhoods and not the dog park itself.
Food trucks are bogged down by the City’s unnecessary red-tape which means they are not able to be as successful as they could be. Not only does this decrease demand for products from suppliers, it costs Edmontonians jobs and the City of Edmonton an opportunity at increasing economic prosperity.
As the Councillor for Ippihkoohkanipiaohtsi, I will make sure that we are protecting businesses and adding more jobs for Edmontonians. It’s time city council starts caring more about our economic future.
Like many of my candidates across our city, I am taking a hiatus from door-knocking on account of the public health orders currently in place. As more Edmontonians get vaccinated, our campaign team will be engaging with Ipiihkoohkanipiaohtsi residents virtually. I hope to start meeting you from a safe distance at the beginning of June.
By then I’ll also know where things stand (I hope) with the AstraZeneca vaccine. I got my first dose in mid-March, so my second is due at the beginning of June, if the 12 week interval still holds up.
However the decision by Alberta Health to use the current stock of 8,400 doses for a second jab still leaves plenty of question marks over how the distribution plan for that particular brand of vaccine will play out.
My team and I also decided to hold off on distributing campaign literature in the meantime, out of an abundance of caution, just so we can cut down on any inadvertent close contacts.
But that doesn’t mean I want to avoid you!
If you have any comments, questions or concerns about events or activities in Ipiihkoohkanipiaohtsi please send me a note at [email protected] and I would be happy to connect with you.
I will strive to work to make Edmonton Transit more appealing and make commuting by bus or LRT part of your routine.
However if the very unscientific poll I conducted over the weekend is any indication, Edmonton Transit has its work cut out for it reversing the trend over the last few years of declining ridership.
Historically, the biggest boost ETS ever got was years ago when the LRT expanded. Drivers flocked to the Century Park Park'n'Ride and hopped on first thing in the morning; that dramatically increased the passenger counts.
Traffic on transit has been declining ever since, and the delays in both the Metro and Valley Lines haven’t helped.
So I asked you via Twitter-poll how the week-old revised bus network would change your travel habits.
Out of 119 votes, 52 percent said they will continue to drive because of the perception that transit is too dangerous.
That sentiment is reflected in a move by the city to increase safety and security measures on the transit system. New joint operational teams involving Edmonton Police and Transit Peace officers were introduced in May.
What the bus network redesign was intended to do
The idea behind reworking the bus system for the first time in a couple of decades was to have main routes increase frequency to get you to your destination more quickly. However, the tradeoff was for you to walk further to get on board.
Only 8 percent agreed with both statements that they’d be more likely to take transit either because their commute would be easier, or they would do it even if their route is changed.
Nearly a third of respondents said they are less likely to take transit because it is now less efficient.
So what to do?
Improvements are needed
“My daughter used to have a 6-minute direct route to school. Now it's close to 30 minutes and she has to change buses across a busy road. She's 13,” wrote one respondent to the poll. “If it wasn’t a pandemic I would be fine for most things but it is a pandemic so I’ll take my bicycle,” said another.
“It totally sucks and messed up the daily schedule for many families who had the close by stops cancelled,” said a third who didn’t like how many stops, like the one near their home disappeared. “My son has to walk 500 m to get to the nearest bus stop and other families have (a) worse situation. It’s (a) really very irresponsible and intimidating decision by the government.”
I’ll work to get improvements made. There’s nothing worse than sitting on a bus, stuck in the same traffic as other private vehicles. Where is the incentive, if your ride isn’t any quicker than being in your own car? ETS buses need priority in traffic. If extra lanes in key congestion areas can’t be easily built, then technology at traffic lights, to give them a head start should be used.
Increased surveillance like additional on-board cameras are also needed, so ETS can say with authority that if you misbehave, you will be caught.
Heritage Valley park'n’ride is still relatively new. Let’s think together on a business plan to help it thrive in south Edmonton.
If elected as City Councillor, I will push for the City to explore tax incentives that would encourage developers to include child care spaces in or near the workplace.
A major priority of business in Edmonton, something I support, is making childcare affordable and accessible to everyone who needs it. It’s right there in the comprehensive policy paper from the Edmonton Chamber of Commerce, Forging our Future.
It’s in the document’s recommendations to Prioritize an Inclusive Recovery for All -- “improve the affordability of and improve access to childcare.”
Outgoing chamber president and CEO Janet Riopel reacted to the April 19 federal budget congratulating the government on the move to bring in a $10-a-day daycare saying post-pandemic is the right time to invest in children and housing.
But will this go anywhere?
Province luke-warm to proposal
In the days after, Premier Jason Kenney in question period, as well as Finance Minister Travis Toews and Children’s Services Minister Rebecca Schulz had reservations, wondering if it’ll be an institutionalized program. Premier Jason Kenney chimed after receiving criticism from the Alberta NDP; he doesn’t want to see “9-5, cookie-cutter, union run, government care.”
Toews added that child care is essential in these economic times, however “any child care agreement between Alberta and Ottawa must respect the diverse needs of children and the fundamental principle of parental choice in child care options."
The Alberta Legislature is where this battle will be played out.
Role for municipalities is limited
Earlier in the campaign I met with the Official Opposition Critic for Children’s Services, Rakhi Pancholi as well as members from the Edmonton Council on Early Learning and Care.
We do know, based on what was reported on Global National’s coverage of the 2021 budget, when comparing costs across the country, Edmonton fits in the middle averaging $44 a day per child.
The unfortunate news is there is a very limited role a city can play. There’s little that can be done to subsidize the much needed child care spaces. Besides, no one is calling for that. There is an agreement to be negotiated between the provinces and the feds. They can duke it out.
It wasn't that long ago the city, working with members of the Amalgamated Transit Union were going to include a daycare in the new garage in north Edmonton. That much desired amenity however was cut because of budget constraints.
However, it’s my intention to play what little role I can to improve this important situation to increase spaces. Work can be done on that file, coordinating with End Poverty Edmonton.
As your city councillor I will work with city staff to reduce needless barriers to increase the time and cost for job creating initiatives.
An important question was raised on Parliament Hill recently about your ability as a business to get the required permits to build a warehouse, which will inherently create jobs. After some digging I found out that Edmonton has a leg up on the City of Toronto in the amount of time, beginning to end, on how long it takes to get through the permitting process.
And with a concerted effort by the City’s Administration and the Planning branch, more red tape can be reduced, potentially putting Edmonton in the lead in all of Canada.
It turns out Edmonton is in the same ball park as other leading countries. On Tuesday, April 13, the CD Howe institute presented to Parliament's Industry Committee on permit wait times globally according to World Bank data:
-South Korea: 28 days
-Singapore: 36 days
-Denmark: 65 days
-Finland: 65 days
-Toronto: 249 days
Strong potential for Edmonton and Ipiihkoohkanipiaohtsi
MP Pierre Poilievre and Edmonton's Deputy City Manager Stephanie McCabe can agree on one thing: Canada is not good at tracking this kind of data. However she was able to provide a couple of encouraging examples, that has Edmonton business owners receiving permits in up to double digit days as opposed to over 8 months in Toronto.
One is a purpose-built warehouse in the Mistatim Industrial area in the city’s northwest for a U.S. pharmaceutical company that got their permits in 43 days. “The city worked closely with the builder,” McCabe said adding the project brought high-skill jobs, and improved Edmonton’s reputation with investors. “The developer also told us that because of the speed of the building permit process, they were able to secure a major institutional partner to invest in further industrial redevelopment.”
Another project was an expansion on an existing site, best described as a brewery/distillery project. The City again worked closely with the builder and was able to deliver their development permit in 31 days from application.
Home builders like Edmonton, too
Edmonton scored well in a survey from the Canadian Home Builders’ Association. We came in number two behind Regina in the amount of time it takes from start to finish in the permitting process.
And there is room to improve, as Edmonton was 17th in government charges, while being first in planning features and 4th in approvals timelines. Credit has been given to the city’s concierge service for speeding up the process.
With the new city plan that strives for 15-minute communities, this faster service should encourage more coordinated construction to fill in any gaps that exist, especially with more calls for the “missing middle” style of low-rise housing that can be an anchor to the town-centre approach that brings together a larger mix of residential and commercial development.
More can be done says a prominent business leader
Grant Fedoruk, the president of Leading Edge Physiotherapy said he’s encouraged by this for large projects, based on “how the city worked with the builder.” He credits the city in how it helps customers navigate the system who are “a someone, because you get the kind of attention needed for permitting.”
“If you are a little local guy like me, you don’t.”
Grant told me there are concerns from his industry about how Edmonton insists on his and other worksites having to have the same type of ventilation policy that is equal to other health care facilities. “This standard adds 40% to the cost of the ventilation system and makes physio clinic design ventilation as though we are performing medical procedures. This does not exist for physio clinics anywhere else in Canada.”
Decision makers want consistency from a municipality, and quick access because time is money. I’ll make sure that’s what Edmonton strives for.
With the month of March coming to a close, taxes that are too high seems to be a recurring theme. Maybe the T-word is top of mind because we’re all having to take part in our annual check-in with Ottawa.
I’m hoping to find ways to keep more money in your bank account by keeping property taxes as low as possible. That’s by reducing spending at city hall. A way to do that is resisting the call to add programs, and increase services.
A question that is not asked enough on city council, and something I hope to change, is “what’s the downside to not doing this?” A couple of items came across my desk recently that drive that point home.
One shows the taxpayers’ emotion over who foots the bill. The “Nextdoor” bulletin board website saw a complaint about compounding double digit “tax increases” over the past ten years. Mention was made too about city council’s fascination with “shiny objects”. Ironically the post was removed by the moderators after reply comments became too politically charged for a website not intended for political discourse.
Economic professors weigh in
The other document comes from the University of Calgary School of Public Policy which warns about the dangers of rising commercial property taxes and the negative impact they have on investment. It’s a research paper co-authored by Bev Dahlby, Ergete Ferede and Mukesh Khanal from the University of Alberta, MacEwan University and the University of Calgary.
Bottom line, it validates what we’ve heard before in the previous claims of the business community that rising non-residential property taxes are harmful for both business and the City as a whole.
“When considering an increase in their non-residential property tax rates, Alberta municipalities must also take into account the adverse effects such an increase will likely have on business investment in their communities. Based on data on commercial and industrial permit values for 17 Alberta cities from 1998 to 2017, this paper shows that increasing the non-residential property tax rate corresponds to a drop in businesses investment in buildings and structures. Raising the non-residential property tax rate by, for example, 10 per cent results in a seven per cent drop in business investment.”
Where to go from here
Edmonton over the last couple of decades has followed a policy to do two kinds of construction: build new, and rehab what’s already in place. And it’s slowly shifted from the former to the latter. That work helps with job creation, and gives us good value for money.
Long term savings can be found, as council looks to supporting the campaign to end homelessness, as it tries to lift our vulnerable population out of poverty, while reducing the expenses in healthcare and policing.
As new neighbourhoods crop up, we'll be faced with the reality that they cost more to build, compared to the tax revenue they bring in over their lifespan. It's an inescapable reality. It's been that way for decades.
It's why the city plan, looking at a population of 2-million promotes infill, and 15-minute communities. But there is enough space for both building in Rossdale, the Exhibition Lands, Blatchford and along transit corridors.
Just don't dismiss our inventory in Ipiikhookhanipiaohhtsi of new communities that young couples are attracted to as a first home.
So sure, spend on bridge maintenance, or fixing roofs, even re-cladding buildings and upgrading HVAC systems especially when the project pays for itself in energy savings over a set period of time.
Yet is an Office of the Integrity Commissioner, coupled with an ethics advisor needed? How about re-examining how large the budget is for ad space, and air time to promote programs that people know about already? And maybe it’s time to bite the bullet on high-cost, low-return hours of operation on rec facilities, and concentrate on running programs when the bulk of the population will use them? Repurpose the single sheet ice rinks with a partner to share costs? That's something identified in the city's "reimagine plan" that I agree with.
Let’s stick with the need to haves. Once we get that in order we'll have time to worry about the nice to haves later.
Let me tell you about a visit I made this week to the Edmonton International Airport. A long planned tour of the campus provided me with an eye-opening look at what is a growing economic driver for Edmonton and Ipiikhookhanipiaohtsi.
Lynn Wyton, the airport’s director of strategic business connections, who doubled as my tour guide, said the anticipation is to grow the workforce by another 10,000 to 26,000 by 2025.
While everyone is hurting because of COVID-19, EIA is weathering the storm. Across it’s 70,000 acres, economic output is $3.2 billion a year, led by steady gains made in cargo.
One thing that is keeping business humming, is Edmonton International’s geography on the Asia to North America cargo flightpath. Anchorage, Edmonton’s competition is punching above its weight, yet Edmonton is more than hanging in there.
Cargo is helping diversify Edmonton’s and Alberta’s economies. A growing business is in value-added agricultural products. Not just the ones grown in Leduc County, but from all over the west. Wyton pointed out Washington State cherries as an example. Trucked in from south of the border, they’re on Edmonton’s tarmac, loaded in cargo planes and on Asian store shelves in a matter of 36 hours. The same can be said for products from all over B.C. and Alberta.
Investment is being driven into EIA. A second billion dollars in infrastructure has now been invested. DHL, Purolator, FedEx and others have facilities sitting on the apron. Rosenau Trucking is a major player that wasn’t imaginable a few years ago. You know about the Premium Outlet Mall, and the Costco as the airport’s real estate portfolio continues to grow. There’s the race track, and Aurora Sky covering several acres as well.
Job losses from a year ago are now on the rebound
No doubt, the largest task facing Edmonton over the next several years is getting people back to work. And a lot of factors will have to go into that, including keeping costs as low as possible for business owners, while allowing them to maximize efficiency.
When the Bank of Canada maintained its trendsetting policy interest rate at 0.25 percent Wednesday it also cautioned, “there is still considerable economic slack and a great deal of uncertainty about the evolution of the virus and the path of economic growth. The labour market is a long way from recovery, with employment still well below pre-COVID levels.
Edmonton city council has a key role to play with transit
While the airport lies just outside of Edmonton’s boundaries, our city council needs to give it the tools it needs. Council can do this by supporting Route 747, which serves as the city’s chief public transit between EIA and Century Park.
Route 747 is a vital transportation link for our region, including for many Edmontonians who work in the area. That includes young folks starting out on their careers, new Canadians establishing an economic foothold for their families, and folks who do not have access to a car or choose not to drive.
For visitors coming to Edmonton from other places in Canada and around the world, the 747 bus may provide their first impression of Edmonton. It might be their best option getting into the city. Let’s make it easy for visitors to get into our city. Let’s make a good first impression, and encourage visitors and investors to come here.
I’m making the commitment to ensuring the 747 not only maintains its current shared schedule with Leduc and the airport, but service grows as airport activity increases in the coming years.
It was supposed to get better, but it didn’t. A recent audit pointed out how much was spent at City Hall on consulting services. The bill came in at almost $600 million over the five years from 2015 to 2019.
That’s over and above what was found in 2017 by a whopping 32 percent.
Tracking the money was difficult, as entries were miscoded, the audit reports. “As a result financial reporting related to the City’s consulting expenses has been inaccurate by $245 million in total over the last five years.”
An overwhelming segment of this consulting work is for capital projects as outside engineers, architects or other technical experts are brought in, because the expertise is not “in house” among city staff.
Why it’s done this way
Senior management with the city will explain this as saying the scope of a project will grow, so the contracts will be extended as an additional year or two will be added to the overall work.
The premise is also that outside consultants are overall less expensive, as they are paid on a per-project basis, and cheaper than having individuals on staff permanently.
Yet I can see problems continuing to get worse, not better. What got me wanting to put my name forward to be part of the next city council was an earlier audit this past fall that you’ve all heard about, where city auditor David Wiun was critical of the “managers managing managers” syndrome that has grown at City Hall.
A chance for a fresh start on spending priorities
I’m hoping the top to bottom review of City Hall budgets, brought on because of the COVID-19 reassessment of what is priority spending and what isn’t, will reduce financial pressure and mean only those projects that are considered of utmost importance will go ahead.
We already know that a three year drop in the construction grant the province gives cities, the Municipal Sustainability Initiative [MSI] is taking a $150 million chunk out of Edmonton’s budget.
That cut is on top of the agreement that was in place between the city, and the province, but was ripped up unilaterally by the Kenney government a couple of years ago when the money woes hit under the dome.
What is clear, is there is not a lot of money around to be had, so focused decisions will need to be made on spending priorities over the next four years.
It doesn’t mean saying “no” to every proposal. Each project should be judged on if it brings value. If there is a way to run buses from the new Heritage Valley transit centre and park’n’ride to the Century Park LRT more efficiently then the investment should gain council approval.
In many ways, since the money simply won’t be there council should say “yes” to the projects that make sense.
An update from Canada’s Auditor General pointed out that First Nations communities will face the prospect of not having safe drinking water for several years.
Ninety-nine drinking water advisories have been lifted since 2015, however 57 remain in effect said the auditor’s report released February 25.